Medishield-life: Rich people ROB poor people's life savings in Singapore. - Singapore Forums by SGClub.com
Singapore Forums by SGClub.com
Sitemap Contact Us FAQ Singapore Forums by SGClub.com
Home Photos Member List Register Mark Forums Read  
Go Back Home > Lifestyle > SGClub Cafe » Medishield-life: Rich people ROB poor people's life savings in Singapore.

Why aren't you a member of SGClub.com yet??

» Join 130,000+ other members in chatting.
» Make lots of new friends here.
» Keep up-to-date with current events.
» Participate in Club outings.
» Download lots of Free Stuff!

Registration just takes 2mins and is absolutely free so join our community today!

I Want to Choose my Own Personal Nickname Now!


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 1st December 2018, 08:13 PM   #1 (permalink)
Addicted SGClubber
BicCherry will become famous soon enough

 
BicCherry's Avatar
 
Posts: 983
Join Date: Mar 2010
Likes: 36
Liked 23 Times in 21 Posts
Gender:

Medishield-life: Rich people ROB poor people's life savings in Singapore.

Medishield-life: Rich people ROB poor people's life savings in Singapore.

Rich Singaporeans are competing to claim 2.03786x more than middle class, yet medishield-life is supposed to be pre-funded by all, INCLUDING the poor; why do the poor subsidise the rich in the medishield-life insurance scheme?

According to MOH stats, "Nine per cent of full rider policyholders made claims in 2016, compared to 7 per cent of those without riders"
"According to MOH, the average bill claimed by a full rider policyholder cost S$9,093 in 2016, about 58.5 per cent higher than that of an average IP holder (S$5,738). Patients with riders were more likely to visit private hospitals than those without riders, contributing to a bulk of this differential. "


Calculation:
Since hospitalization claims rate for rider holder is 9% as opposed to 7% for non-rider holders and also 1.585X more for rider holders,
Increase payout value to rider holders= 9/7 X 1.585= 2.03786 times that of average IP holders.

Since private insurers selling IP plans make claims from (and basic premium payments) to MOH wrt medishield-life, it can be said that those with full riders make in excess of 2X claims from the common medishield-life insurance pool.

Pls note that the actual multiple may actually be even higher than 2.03786 times, since MOH own definition of the 'average IP' holder is likely to also include BOTH partial and full rider holders, the latter of whom make up 30% of the IP pool which in itself is constituted by the more wealthy 68% of Singaporeans.

It was also reported that poorer Singaporeans are unable to receive proper public healthcare cancer treatments because even the public transport costs to and from hospital may turn out to be a hindrance in itself.

It is also noted that the MOH is subsidising many wealthy Singaporeans indiscriminately just based on their declared household address and income levels even though by the fact that these Singaporeans can afford not just IP plans or worse, even very expensive full rider add-on plans, remains prima facie evidence that (MOH is squandering state funds to buy votes given that) by their expensive taste for expensive insurance products, these same wealthy folks are indeed very well to do.

In its inception, MOH explained the huge jump in compulsory medishield-life premiums over the old optional medishield plans by using 'prefunding' (with the option of future premium discounts and refunds) as the reason why basic medishield-life premiums for the young increased so much. Yet, short of doing IP plan insurance companies a business favour and helping them mediate amongst themselves an agreement to cease the sale of loss making full rider for medishield-life IP plans (and coincidentally reducing the population of (double value claims) full rider holders in the process), MOH is doing precious little independently to lead in reducing the raw deal that medishield-life especially gives to the poor ('prefunding') and the SQUANDERING OF STATE FUNDS, aka increase in GST. Perhaps, for a start, all basic medishield-life subsidies to anybody with an IP rider should be REMOVED with immediate effect and those with IPs, 1year later. Only those on BASIC medishield-life compulsory insurance (and no other hospitalization insurance plans) can qualify for medishield-life premium subsidies of any form.

Ultimately, no medishield-life nor associated integrated plans should be valid at any private hospital because those Singaporeans who wish to have private insurance coverage are like those who buy/ invest property in foreign jurisdictions: they still have to serve NS in Singapore. But if they have robbers inside their foreign properties, they will call the police of that foreign country in which their home is burgled; the Singapore police force cannot help them with anything that happens on foreign soil. Likewise, all medishield-life related insurance policies shall ONLY apply in PUBLIC hospitals. Those who want private healthcare, they have to buy SEPARATE insurance coverage and only AFTER they have paid up their annual basic medishield-life premiums.

In short, medishield-life and its subsidy structure is a raw deal for poorer Singaporeans and a big extravagance of government funds with the consequence that GST has to be unnecessarily raised for all. Ultimately, the poor are suffering excessively under this PAP raw deal.

The original source URL of this thread is at https://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/eat-drink-man-woman-16/calculation-medishield-life-encourages-rich-rob-poor-peoples-life-savings-5946620.html#post117893855

Sponsors:
BicCherry is offline  
Add to BicCherry's Reputation Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2018, 11:07 PM   #2 (permalink)
Addicted SGClubber
BicCherry will become famous soon enough

 
BicCherry's Avatar
 
Posts: 983
Join Date: Mar 2010
Likes: 36
Liked 23 Times in 21 Posts
Gender:

Re: Medishield-life: Rich people ROB poor people's life savings in Singapore.

Originally Posted by BBCWatcher (HWZ)
There’s some merit in this argument. I think there are two additional, relatively easy fixes that’d go a long way to temper private hospital inflation:

1. For policyholders who choose private hospital care, just set the MediShield Life payout to be equal to what MediShield Life would pay for an equivalent stay in public hospital B2 ward. Right now it has the same proration factor as public hospital A ward, which seems much too generous. I don’t think there should be a proration factor at all since private hospital pricing can be wild, and a percentage of wild is still wild. So just cap the MSL reimbursement at whatever dollar amount would apply to a public hospital B2 ward stay.

This adjustment might need to be phased in over a period of, say, 3 years since it’d be something of a shock to the private hospital insurance market.

2. When somebody pays for a private hospital Integrated Shield base plan, put another limit on the amount of MediSave that can be used to pay the premiums for that plan. The limit should be equal to the cost of the public hospital A ward Integrated Shield base plan (on a market average basis probably) or the Annual Withdrawal Limit (which already applies), whichever is lower.

I would add that better controlling MediShield Life costs means that coverage can be improved. I’d like to see some coverage expansion into chronic diseases (and medicines), for example. And into prenatal and maternity care, in part because it’s long past time the government got much more aggressive in trying to boost Singapore’s birth rate. Try throwing the kitchen sink at the problem, in policy terms.
About your point 1: "set the MediShield Life payout to be equal to what MediShield Life would pay for an equivalent stay in public hospital B2 ward". I say wild is still wild. Just because they don't pay 1¢, some integrated plan with rider holders demand (or their docs offer) investigation for every small thing, many unnecessary to begin with.

Thus no matter how u look at it, the current over claims situation of 2-3x average will still persists simply because one group (poor) has to pay a % out of pocket but the rich take advantage of the poor in this shared scheme because they treat health care like a buffet with a free hotel stay thrown in.

Maybe one simple way to prorate would be grossly by on a median per day of admission basis.

For those with riders, the proration to insurer would be 50% or less of the equavalent basic medishield-life pay out to a class C patient because it is shown that people with riders have the habit of claiming 2.04 times as much as those with integrated plans but without riders.

Those with integrated plans should have insurer compensated at 80% of the equivalent public hospital C class daily charges because only more wealthy people can afford integrated plans and the 20% will be an implicit subsidy to the poor in Singapore.

No integrated plan or private medical insurance user should receive any form of medishield-life premium subsidy at all because they have obviously more expensive taste and thus should fail the means test for medishield-life subsidies in this regard.

Ultimately, medishield-life should be governed just like public transportation or NS. Everyone must serve the NS even if they should subsequently migrate away from Singapore and everyone has to pay taxes to subsidise public transportation even if they solely travel by PMD or private cars. Likewise, everyone should contribute to medishield-life regardless of whether they use public hospitals (those who want to extend cover to higher class wards in public hospitals can opt for integrated shield plans but all medishield-life plans will have same deductable and co-insurance payment %).

Private hospital insurance plans will be available to non- Singaporeans/PR and only Singaporeans whose medishield-life premiums are not in arrears will be able to participate in any private healthcare insurance plan. All Singaporeans with integrated shield plans and/or private healthcare insurance will also not be eligible for any medishield-life subsidies unless except on a case by case basis (e.g. if they have a rare congenital disease which cannot be treated at a public hospital).

BicCherry is offline   Add to BicCherry's Reputation Reply With Quote
Old 17th December 2018, 10:18 PM   #3 (permalink)
Addicted SGClubber
BicCherry will become famous soon enough

 
BicCherry's Avatar
 
Posts: 983
Join Date: Mar 2010
Likes: 36
Liked 23 Times in 21 Posts
Gender:

Re: Medishield-life: Rich people ROB poor people's life savings in Singapore.

New version:

Medishield-life: Rich people ROB poor people's life savings in Singapore.

Rich Singaporeans are competing to claim 2.03786x more than middle class, yet medishield-life is supposed to be pre-funded by all, INCLUDING the poor http://www.asiaone.com/health/role-pre-funding ; why do the poor ironically and paradoxically subsidise the rich in the medishield-life insurance scheme?

According to MOH stats, "Nine per cent of full rider policyholders made claims in 2016, compared to 7 per cent of those without riders"
"According to MOH, the average bill claimed by a full rider policyholder cost S$9,093 in 2016, about 58.5 per cent higher than that of an average IP holder (S$5,738). Patients with riders were more likely to visit private hospitals than those without riders, contributing to a bulk of this differential. "


Calculation:
Since hospitalization claims rate for rider holder is 9% as opposed to 7% for non-rider holders and also 1.585X more for rider holders,
Increase payout value to rider holders= 9/7 X 1.585= 2.03786 times that of average IP holders.

Since private insurers selling IP plans make claims from (and basic premium payments) to MOH wrt medishield-life, it can be said that those with full riders make in excess of 2X claims from the common medishield-life insurance pool.

Pls note that the actual multiple may actually be even higher than 2.03786 times, since MOH own definition of the 'average IP' holder is likely to also include BOTH partial and full rider holders, the latter of whom make up 30% of the IP pool which in itself is constituted by the more wealthy 68% of Singaporeans.

It was also reported that poorer Singaporeans are unable to receive proper public healthcare cancer treatments because even the public transport costs to and from hospital may turn out to be a hindrance in itself.

It is also noted that the MOH is subsidising many wealthy Singaporeans indiscriminately just based on their declared household address and income levels even though by the fact that these Singaporeans can afford not just IP plans or worse, even very expensive full rider add-on plans, remains prima facie evidence that (MOH is squandering state funds to buy votes given that) by their expensive taste for private healthcare and also even zero payment riders, these wealthy folks are indeed very well to do.

In its inception, MOH explained the huge jump in compulsory medishield-life premiums over the old optional medishield plans by using 'prefunding' (with the option of future premium discounts and refunds) as the reason why basic medishield-life premiums for the young increased so much. Yet, short of doing IP plan insurance companies a business favour and helping them mediate amongst themselves an agreement to cease the sale of loss making full rider for medishield-life IP plans (and coincidentally reducing the population of (double value claims) full rider holders in the process), MOH is doing precious little independently to lead in reducing the raw deal that medishield-life especially gives to the poor ('prefunding') and the SQUANDERING OF STATE FUNDS, aka increase in GST. Perhaps, for a start, all basic medishield-life subsidies to anybody with an IP rider should be REMOVED with immediate effect and those with IPs, 1year later. Only those on BASIC medishield-life compulsory insurance (and no other hospitalization insurance plans) can qualify for medishield-life premium subsidies of any form.

Ultimately, no medishield-life nor associated integrated plans should be valid at any private hospital because those Singaporeans who wish to have private insurance coverage are like those who buy/ invest property in foreign jurisdictions: they still have to serve NS in Singapore. But if they have robbers or terrorist inside their FOREIGN properties, they will call the police of that foreign country in which their home is burgled; the Singapore police force cannot help them with anything that happens on foreign soil. Likewise, all medishield-life related insurance policies shall ONLY apply in PUBLIC hospitals. Those who want private healthcare, they have to buy SEPARATE insurance coverage and only AFTER they have paid up their annual basic medishield-life premiums because medishield-life should be a PUBLIC hospitals only based healthcare insurance policy.

In short, medishield-life funds is being excessively squandered on private healthcare use, its current structure is a raw deal for poorer Singaporeans and a big extravagance of government funds with the consequence that GST has to be unnecessarily raised for all. Ultimately, the poor are suffering excessively under this PAP poorly conceived and wastefully executed public healthcare insurance plan.

The original source URL of this thread is at https://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/e...#post117893855

BicCherry is offline   Add to BicCherry's Reputation Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Calculation: Medishield-life is a Swindle of Singaporean Poor. BicCherry SGClub Cafe 6 15th September 2018 11:18 PM
Medishield-life turns out to be a scam that robs poor people in Singapore? BicCherry SGClub Cafe 4 12th March 2018 08:26 PM
Singapore: Medishield-life= life support for a BANKRUPT healthcare system? BicCherry Health & Fitness 0 20th February 2016 06:09 AM
Proof that Medishield-life is squandering public money, sponsoring people to spend/consume way beyon BicCherry Health & Fitness 2 21st March 2015 01:56 AM
Medishield-life: premiums for obese people should be at least 5% more... BicCherry Health & Fitness 0 27th November 2014 10:15 AM

» Sponsors
Watch Free Movies Online
Celebrity Gossip
Food Delivery

» Facebook Fans
» What's Going On?
Title, Username, & Date
Inspirational Songs
S’porean, 17, arrested under ISA out on 2-year Restriction Order
Ex-freelance religious teacher and his student issued Restriction Orders under Internal...
AVA recalls 'kok zai' peanut snack after metal fragment found in Malaysian product
Post anything random on this thread.
Bizlink Cafe
Tips for O/A levels Chemistry students
IRVINS Salted Egg apologises after dead lizard found in packet of fish skin snack
Choose water - Drink Up!
Planet Earth
ICA officer pleads guilty to obtaining sexual favours from immigration offenders
Boy, 13, arrested after allegedly knocking down woman at Pasir Ris Park while on e-bike
Good Samaritans save trapped kitten in hour-long rescue outside Waterway Point
Bug found in 'specialty' coffee on Boxing Day: ‘I spat out what looked like bits of...
For safety, cyclist should always ride 2 abreast on left most lane for roads with mor
Burst pipe in Potong Pasir leaves homes without water for several hours
Chinese Garden turtle museum finds new home in Yishun
Cockroach-infused soup ruins Christmas gathering for friends
Do you know?
Title: The worth of Christians in God’s sight
Featured Photos
by marisoljames322
· · ·
Member Galleries
20359 photos
13619 comments
by marisoljames322
· · ·
Member Galleries
20359 photos
13619 comments
by pdsubbu
· · ·
Member Galleries
20359 photos
13619 comments
by Vikas Dhar
· · ·
Photography
35 photos
36 comments
by aaudreygan
· · ·
Guy Photos
1581 photos
946 comments
by aaudreygan
· · ·
Girl Photos
4352 photos
15504 comments
by a8paris
· · ·
Guy Photos
1581 photos
946 comments
by a8paris
· · ·
Guy Photos
1581 photos
946 comments
by aaricia
· · ·
Girl Photos
4352 photos
15504 comments
by aaricia
· · ·
Girl Photos
4352 photos
15504 comments

 

All times are GMT +8. The time now is 11:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright© 2004-2013 SGClub.com. All rights reserved.