 » What's Going On? | | |  LIVE IT LOUD? 06-11-2009 06:48 PM 06-11-2009 06:48 PM 0 Comments, 124 Views | |  | | | 
06-06-2008, 01:22 PM
|
| | Grand Advisor
Posts: 1,966
Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Bedok Reservoir Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0 Gender: 
Total SGC$: 145.88 |  Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen
Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen 
Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen is an upcoming science...
__________________
Those who are skilled in combat do not become angered, those who are skilled at winning do not become afraid.
Thus the wise win before the fight, while the ignorant fight to win ~~~ Zhuge Liang
Last edited by Voodoo Vince; 14-06-2009 at 06:57 AM.
| 
|  |
By
5thalo
on
29-06-2009, 11:48 PM
| Re: Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen
The movie is just so so for me.
It is a big ADV for the US military.
The rail gun that destory devestator was a fictional ver of a the real rail developed by the US.
soon to be deply on Destroyers | | | | | Re: Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen
Do not realli like transformer 2. preferred transformer 1..
the ending was too sudden imho..
too much fighting scene and story line wasnt tt gd..
i had realize something, those movie trailer's tt is realli attractive and great, the actual movie turn out to be realli bad.. haiz.. | | | | | Re: Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen
Well i believe that the movie is really really awesome.  | | | | | Re: Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen
For me, I feel that transformer 2 was better movie than transformer 1.  | | | | | Re: Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen
Great great movie. | | |
By
lzk123
on
30-06-2009, 08:43 PM
| | Member reviews | | Entertainment | | 5 | | Plot | | 4 | | Acting | | 5 | | Overall | | 4 | |
Average 90%
|
| Re: Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen
Quote:
Originally Posted by IrishCream  Do not realli like transformer 2. preferred transformer 1..
the ending was too sudden imho..
too much fighting scene and story line wasnt tt gd..
i had realize something, those movie trailer's tt is realli attractive and great, the actual movie turn out to be realli bad.. haiz.. | ya agree wif u. | | | | | Re: Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen
| | |
By
lzk123
on
30-06-2009, 09:10 PM
| | Member reviews | | Entertainment | | 5 | | Plot | | 4 | | Acting | | 5 | | Overall | | 4 | |
Average 90%
|
| Re: Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen
Quote:
Originally Posted by soulblader |  lol | | | | |  Re: Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen
Comment from other forum....... Quote:
The movie was awesome until the part when Optimus died (The first time , I mean)... After which the plot was a bit draggy, esp the part where the Sam and his gf spend about an hour or so gg to Egypt and stuff... That part in the middle, was a huge let down...
And the Last part felt very rushed (the plot, i mean)...
and so much for the battle between the Fallen and the Optimus cos it was over in a few minutes... The extensive action sequences could have been bit tapered down for the last part.(I kind of went numb) and was it me, or did I smell Indiana Jones & Crystul Skull for the last third of the movie... Hmmm...
The pluses were from the prev installment, was that they focus a bit more on the robots (Esp Optimus) this time compared to prev. franchise which was all SAM (Shia le Bouf guy). For the third installment, they def have to focus more on the robots... I mean seriousely who the hell cares whether Shia farks the gal or not...
All in all, for a blockbuster movie ..It satisfies all the criteria...and fans, will enjoy the countless Autobots and Decepticons thrown in...
Good movie overall, But leave ur brain at home...
| Quote:
Yup, just watched it and that's exactly what it is.
It's very action packed - overwhelming.
There was little cohesion, too much happening and too many robots. I mean come on, there was a ton of them unleashed even in Transformers: The Movie Cartoon, but there's something called a story and pacing which seems to not have gotten that much attention.
Overall I like it despite my gripes, but it didn't live up to the grandeur and pace held by the first movie. Revenge of the Fallen just packs so much action to the point that you can't appreciate some of the stuff and just take it for granted. There's not much of the 'awe' effect if you over-do stuff.
Best parts are perhaps the first fight scene with Optimus, Devastator and perhaps the final portion of the last battle. The rest of the movie/action was still awesome, but more detail, better pacing, and better background score/sub-notes should have followed to crank the movie a notch better.
7/10 for me.
Would i watch it again? Yeah - Cos I need to take in the details better :s13:
(yea, I'm a nut for some movies; watched Terminator 4 twice and Star Trek thrice)
| Quote:
michael bay must die.
This cock sucker makes the worst movies ever.
I understand if they had to made the movie kid friendly to "sell toys"
I mean i grew up in the 80s. Watching cartoons like transformers, gi joe, centurions, m.a.s.k was my staple diet. It was campy and cheesy, i agree but those were the 80s. WHAT WASNT CHEESY IN THE 80S?
Hell the transformers movie cartoon was better than both these movies.
The latest star trek was epic because it had a good director in jj abrams.
SPOILERS BELOW
Transformers is all about the robots. Not about some punk ass kid who has a hot girlfriend who could read hylogryphics. The plot was as weak as those typical scary movie ****.
Those tiny robots .. i mean ..why?? the twin robots.. seriously WTF?
and worst of all .. worst of all.. the AUTOBOTS WERE NO WHERE TO BE SEEN IN THE WHOLE MOVIE.
Optimus had 2 big fights and was dead most of the time. Bumblebee is only pops out when that kid is almost gonna die or something..
the likes of ratchet and the rest didnt do anything and followed the soldiers command like some recruit just come in tekong first time..
I slept during the 1st movie..i really really wanted to give this a good rating.. but seriously... WTF?
| Quote: |
Gawd! Never would I believe that I have to struggle to stay awake in the midst of a movie called Transformers! I enjoyed the 1st movie as it was something new but Michael Bay should just disappear from our universe for turning one of my favourite cartoons from the 80s into an unforgivable mess! The focus seems to be more on Shia and Megan than on the robots, which have become secondary characters in the background. Again, Michael Bay has opted for visuals over substance and succeeded to an extent by satisfying our senses. However, The Devastator, the monster which many are looking forward to incur largel-scale damage, is a huge letdow. The fighting scenes are confusing and become repetitive after a while. Think the Harvester scene from Terminator Salvation is more exciting than any of the fighting scenes in this movie. Unfortunately, Revenge of the Fallen will still make tons of money as it has fulfilled its objective to entertain as a brainless popcorn movie. Let's hope that we will see more emphasis on the robots next time and better fights.
| Quote:
Just watched it. It's long, loud, and mindless. Even more chaotic than the first.
I liked the first film better.
| Quote:
as a transformer fan, im utterly dissapointed
6/10
-poor story
-predictable ending
-overexaggerated human behaviours
-messy fights
-lame jokes
-poor robot designs
-unserious plots
-bad story flow
-too many unimportant characters
-dull fight scenes
-repetitive battles
conclusion: sucky show
i especially hate the damn ugly twin robots and other mini ugly robots, really spoilt the original transformer story,
the story can do without them if not for the fact that Chevrolet paid them tonnes of money to showcase their cars in the show
| Quote:
the robots have nice fight scene if michael bay execute properly.
It seems to me this show is in a rash production as it took 1.5yrs after the first movie.
to me, a lot of scenes are not filmed exquisitely and the movie flow is abit abrupt.
I can understand why autobots is not focused in this movie as it is a decepticon movie  | Quote:
i think the biggest bad pt abt this movie is tt human tech is way too powerful. u can see tt some of the decepticons are taken down by the human soldiers and not autobots! even megatron seems to be having some problem. this is so unlike their declaration earlier on in the movie abt destroying the world. the most stupid thing is just the rail gun. michael bay must have ran out of idea how to kill Devastator. i left the movie thinking why on earth the military just use the rail gun and kill every single one of the decepticons.
one more grudge is like wat ppl mentioned above, lots of unknown robots and tt too many similar color scheme making it hard to distinguish one robot from another.
the whole movie is still ok with lots of actions just a few bad pts abt it, making it worse than transformer 1.
| Quote:
My suggestion to those going to watch this movie, if you want to enjoy the movie:
"Switch off your brain."
Unfortunately, the intellectuals in us are bound to be disappointed in some way or another. Let's face it. Michael Bay is a movie-maker whose success depends mostly on the special effects. He's no story-teller.
I wonder if he co-wrote the script.
As for Devastator, the one in the first movie was ridiculous. The one in this movie... errr... looks like a bot on a unicycle (for the lack of a better description).
He should have looked more like this:
 | Quote:
by the way, can anyone tell me why robots have beard and carry a walking stick and spit saliva?
this show should really go to hell
| Quote:
and few double character...like mixmaster... he alr joined with the rest of decepticon to form devastator...and in the desert battling the human and autobot...there was another mixmaster 
didn't make sense for me...
and bumblebee in the desert fighting with 1 red robot that attack sam...but that red robot alr joined to become devastator what...means got 2 of them???
| Quote:
Funny enough, alot of ppl found his gags amusing. I have to concede that his comic timing can be quite bad and the 2 twins are simply redundant.
However, I don't understand what makes you think that only the Autobots could defeat the Decepticons with or without the human aid. It was already said that the US army found out what kind of ammunition to use against the robots' armour. And why do you think that Decepticons are only susceptible to Autobots weaponry?
If you're not impressed with the first movie, why bother to watch the sequel and then rant here that it sucks? Seems like you just get enough of flaming Bay.
| Quote:
Rail gun just basically sums up the last third of the movie, completely made no sense how a single beam could terminate Devastator so quickly.
And if they could use it once, why not use it again and again to fry the rest of the Decepticons.
It was the biggest sore point in the entire plot for me. | Quote:
Wow... It seems that Michael Bay made a mistake by making a sequel since there are so many negative feedbacks on it. Well! I think there won't be anymore movie related to Transformers in the future since there so many people that criticize and complain. Michael Bay can save his time and move on. No point in making a movie and get all the flaks.
It's impossible to accommodate both sides of the audience. If movie-making is so easy, then everyone can be directors and producers.
| Quote:
I really hated female decepticon ! So damn tacky, since when TF became Species
And why must the Autobots work with/under the US govt?
Although I agree with some of the pple here, that TF is nvr about some kid, but as long it's Megan Fox, I'm sold!
Some really redundant characters in the are Sam's roommate and the Sector 7 guy. Really corny.
I vote JJ Abrams for the next movie, no more MB !
| Quote:
seriously go think about it, why the show is not impressive even with such huge budget, why you said "why people think so much , just enjoy the movie... " instead of you saying "wow !!!! that was an awesome movie i have watched in years!! Michael Bay is a killer director!!"
it's because of the crappy details that added up to contribute to the making the show look unimpressive.
for example , you really think showing the Devastator hanging two balls helps in building the climax of the fight scene? when the audience gets so tensed with the fight scene, the two balls lame joke just pissed away the entire climax feeling of the battle like putting a pin on an inflating balloon.
Michael Bay sucks as a director, he just dont know how and when to tell a joke
| Quote:
Watched the movie at GV Max today...
I can sum the movie up in 1 word: disappointing
i giving the movie 2/5
Start Rant:
Theres so many things wrong with the movie the title "louder and dumber" really is an apt description. Its literally a nonsensical plot interspaced with some comedy followed by non-stop explosions, full screen of clashing metals, followed by more explosions. This is michael bay at his worse: he just kicked the transformer mythology in the nuts and shoved it out the door in exhange for a roller coaster ride of explosion and dust.
The movie started at a nice pace, mixing action, a little bit of story, some comedy, then back to action...the pace was pretty good for the 1st hour or so, before everything goes down the drain. Hell the last 30mins was just scene after scene of non stop explosion(and i dun mean this in a good way) before ending in a whole mess without any climax watsoever.
the story... its rubbish... The story feels very "forced" in other to be a sequel. So many loop holes, unexplained parts, ridiculous settings. "The fallen" is suppose to be so strong that only a "Prime" can take it down, then why isnt it just wipe out the rag tag team of autobots when they were just a small team. The twins are hardly worth all the time they are on screen, They;re ugly, hardly comedic, most pple dun give a damn abt the - they are like TF2's version of jar jar blinks. Sidewipe and Arcee barely get any screen time, hell u hardly notice Volt! Whats the point of packing so many 1 dimensional transformers in the movie, when each of them has no back story, hardly talks, barely get 5mins of screen time, ended up killed in an explosion...
Dun even get me started on how the scriptwriter *******ized the Matrix of Leadership into just some silly key to unlock an even sillier harvester, before both of it are destroyed by just 1 blast from Optimus. Heck the fight between the Fallen and Prime hardly last 5mins! The opening fight against demolisher feels much more epic. and even that was pretty short.
The large transformers, esp the decepticons, tend to look mostly silver/grey. When more than 2 of them are on screen, lurging at each other, its easy to just be confused with what the f is happening, and the shaky cam look doesnt help at all. Even worse is when the decepticons are not humanoid in shape, at least for Megatron u can still make up where the arms and legs are, for the others like Savenger, Demolisher, etc, where they are not humanoid, another robot jumping on the first robot and then followed by some shaky cam and all i get is a mish mash of grey matter on screen followed by random explosions.
Also, the "insects" join to forma paper thin transformer? Wtf is that suppose to be.
All the transformers feels as fragile as a glass bottle. Every hit causes some part of the robot to fall off. Its suppose to make u feel, oh that attack is so powerful, but to me it feels like they are really brittle. Devastator? Big deal: 1x ray gun took care of that. Hell if they had such a powerful raygun, u think that they can jolly well take out the Harvestor in one shot, dun even need to wait for it to activate. Hell why not use it to shoot down the damn decepticons with it.
In the end, i leave the theatre feeling somewhat disappointed.
The first movie was so much better...
End Rant
| Quote: |
Watched it with OC yesterday. She was excited about the transformation and such. But to me the movie's a real bore-fest that became as draggy as a korean drama and Naruto. Yet again like the first one, it's a B grade movie with stars and fantastic computer generated imagery. The movie can fight with Independence Day for US military advertisement. Leaving my brain at the door wasn't good enough, I find myself getting bored with the repetitive fights and explosions. In all, a perfect example of all-style no substance.:s13:
| Quote:
Your idiocy has no boundaries. You probably like batman forever compared to batman begins.
How to squeeze 2 and a half hours??
BY CUTTING MORE OF THE STUPID EXPLOSIONS AND FIGHT SCENES AND PUTTING IN MORE STORY AND PLOT INSTEAD OF WITTY 1 LINERS FROM THE RETARDED PARENTS.
Its that easy... u could have great action scenes like gladiator.,but still people of all AGES can enjoy it and appreciate the movie..However, sadly michael bay is not in the same calibre as ridley scott...
| Quote:
The problem is this.... if they really want to make a strong franchise with more movies, you got to make a really good movie. The current one will make a lot of money because the first Transformers has set a pretty good bar. The only problem I've heard with the first one is people either wanting a bit more clashing, but more often is asking about more development of robot characters. Why they asked these? So that they can get attached better and be a true follower.
So while the first one did pretty well generally, this ROTF only squeezed in more fights, explosions, comedy and Megan Fox. Sounds like a good formula? It is. But it will wane away fast, cos if the 3rd installments is just even more of this, it's going fire back as far as big earnings are concerned.
What's missing is good story or follow-through to tie up the gazillion loose ends. To be a little critical, apart from the 2 scenes where Optimus has a major fight and Devastator comes about, most of the story is littered with too much fight scenes to the point that it's an overdose. You can't appreciate the awesomeness of the robots fighting or their importance (there's suddenly too many of them that you can't keep track nor show any attachment to them). Then there's the overdose of military power which unfortunately took place in a similar showdown environment as the first movie.
If the producers really want to prolong this Transformers franchise, a lot of careful planning is required in story telling, not just concentrate on the explosions, gazillion robots, and the girl. This is MAJOR shortsightedness imho. Just look back at the new Batman movies - wonderfully masterminded and not like the Batman movies of the 90s. This is the difference that I believe most of those complained are trying to draw across. Mindless showcase of gadgets without a dumb storyline versus one that still has all the cool stuff, but with an excellent storyline so that the audience is hooked and would keep wanting to come back for future movies. This is important. The longer they can capture the audience, the more other merchandise they can sell. It all falls in place well.
So yes, if one's not looking at the big picture, yes, this movie is still a fun and exciting one to watch. But, would you look forward to more of the same again? If the plot sucks, what else is there to propel the already super full action packed movie like ROTF? It's difficult to up the ante in that direction looking at what's been done.
Than I would like to draw parallels to the Transformers Cartoon Movie of 1986 - if you ask me, this is THE super cartoon movie of epic proportions. They squeezed in soooo many more robots than in the cartoon series - but it was still Awesome. Why? It's just how it was taken. Attention to detail (at least for a cartoon and of its time), charachter development and more. That makes sure the toys sell and eveything else related to TF. And you've a good movie where everyone's satisfied.
I believe that's why some of them are really sore.
ROTF could have been a lot more exciting and awesome without the mindless manner the movie was taken 
To me it's nice, but it's a dissappointment on so many levels to explore TF properly. I think the audience are more mature these days and they can appreciate the differences. There's so many other run of the mill movies out there for mindless viewing. TF didn't have to be one of them.
| Quote:
Popcorn movie can be good brainless fun.. but Transformers 2 is just boringly executed. Talk about popcorn movies.. there are Shoot 'em Up, Die Hard 4, Kung Fu Hustle in recent times. They are as weak-plotted as Transformers but so much more entertaining.
I don't get why the fans are so angry (obviously because the critics hit the nail on the head) since the box office takings are soaring. It's not going to stop the general crowd from having mass orgies with the very well done CGI and transformations (just like my OC did ). At the same time, movie studios will take notice about the money and so the guys with the nice suits will demand for focus on CGI and shiny graphics. This is where criticisms are needed to restrict more transfomers-esque movies. Though it's not like the quality of movies are already bad, what with the countless reboots and Asians remakes. Hollywood is in need of a recession to sort things out.
This is a movie forum, not a fansite of transformers. You are allowed to portray the fanboy in you but others aren't allow to criticise? Maybe that's why people seem to pick on Transformers even more. It's fair game that you prefer to pay 8 dollars to see shiny metals slug it out and megan fox silver screen soft porn, but I think it's also fair that others want a bit more than that.:s12:
| Quote:
Actually i was thinking the LOTR series... esp the final battles.. there were tons of enemies, the scene wasnt very bright, there were a good amt of explosion and at no time do i get confused with who's fighting who. Or maybe even the gladiator scene where there is a nice "final battle" where all the fighting leads to a climax, and then u get closure.
The amount of 5 min characters in the show really doesnt add anything to the movie, u get lots and lots of robots, pple dun get attached to them, and then they are blown up later. Here its really quantity over quality, hell even Soundwave was hardly developed - and he's a fan favorite, let alone the other characters who existence is to be blown up.
This really is a case of "more is less"...
| Quote:
Just completed my watching of Transformers 2 over the weekend and i must say.
Its just not as good as the first 1.
My review below (Some spoilers)
Compared to the first film, Transformers 2 was completely ALL action and no story. Period.
While the first film introduces us to the backstory and the characters, the 2nd film does nothing new to the franchise. It was just mindless 2 and half hours of bash and smash until the very end.
I have a specific gripe about the film:
Why did the US Government not mention or realize that there is a Giant Robot (Soundwave)in Space infiltrating their Satellite? Not a single bonehead in the film even mentioned about noticing Soundwave in space. Huh?
They really shouldn't have a final act in the desert again, which really is like recycling the desert fight in the first film. IMO the final act should have been a battle in space, but then again, maybe it would be too hard, cause it'll only be robots fighting and the humans can't intervene.
I feel also that the film has too much of a happy ending. Why did the Autobots win again? IMO they should have ended the film at a cliffhanger when Optimus Prime died so we can continue the story in a future 3rd film. At least let the Decepticons win for once lolz.
In conclusion, if i gave the first film 9/10, this film deserves at most a 6/10 or 7/10.
Its not a bad movie, just that it cannot hold a candle to the fantastic first film.
| Quote: |
Ditto. I almost dozed off halfway too. Wasn't impressed with the action scenes as they tend to become repetitive after a while. I want to see more interactions among the Transformers. Instead, I saw more of Shia, Megan and a female terminator wannabe. WTF?
| Quote:
deja vu
Aliens (younglings popping out from sacs)
the tribal fight over the machine in BC (Predator fighting at top of pyramid in BC)
the "gate" scene in desert (indi jones)
sinking carrier with debris and bodies (pearl harbor, not guessing the director)
rolling intelligent miniballs (aen flux)
miniballs forming up to slightly larger decept (T2 forming up from puddle)
desert fight scene (transformer 1. they only come to attack frontally, and badly outnumbered humans, ok plus couple more autobats on their side this time, holding out against superior firepower until US military rides into rescue. The Fallen should have used his power of lifting all those tanks and aircraft here instead of later)
lady bot (t3 or sarahchronicle or species sortoff in the bedscene)
rant - ditch the scenes that do not contribute to the already scanty storyline
ditch the roommate
ditch the twins
ditch the individual screening of all the latest miltary gadgets, gets tiresome. instead of loving showing the B1s or carriertop takeoffs etc, Bay could get more ticket receipt$ by using those seconds to extend Fox's lying on top of bike scene
ditch the parents, good for one movie, lousy for second.
ditch animalistic scene eg dog humpings or the minibot humping.
Rating - a summer show that will be forgoten over the years unless one happens to pick up a CD to watch in old years. There are so many other then-state-of-art-CGI-flashbangs without good storyline that many folks remember only so vaguely today. (as matrixfanantic mentioned - like IndependenceDay movie).
| Quote:
I dunno man, maybe i had too much expectations for this movie since the first
movie was so good. Maybe it was due to the script writers strike that caused this.
Anyway it was so funny.
When that army general was asking why they weren't able to send out message or something, I really felt like running up to him and give him a big slap on his head and shout:
"HELLO!?!?!?! ANYONE NOTICE THERE IS A GIANT ROBOT IN SPACE MOLESTING YOUR SATELLITE?? HELLOOOOoo????"
Lolz!! :s13:
Yes, it was a very stupid moment in the film.
| Quote:
Ditto .. i was actually falling asleep halfway through the movie mainly due to the terrible storyline. Its a mind-numbing movie.
But I enjoyed the fight sequences aplenty, was very surprised at the amount of metallic gore and detail.
I give this flick a 7/10 mainly cos its an action popcorn flick. Expect no more than mindless action scenes. Would i watch this again? Yes, but on Blu-ray and I'll skip to the action sequences. =:p
| Quote:
I kinda felt the movie took a downslip after Optimus died in the forest scene.. Until that part, the movie was shiok and Optimus jumping from the plane in the first scene was awesomo , man..
That part of shia finding the sector 7 guy and Jetfire (the aging robot).... (Robots display human symtoms upon aging...)
The middle part shld be totally scraped.. and they shld fast forward to the end...
and focus on Fallen and Optimus duel... which nvr came....
| Quote:
now this movies tops the crap list in this summer's blockbuster. it has pipped Terminator 4.
I almost fell asleep when they were fighting that hour-long tug-war in the desert. I should have taken the reviewer's advice by bring some dose so keep my mind working and my eyes open. The 2nd half is totally dragging and boring. all kinds of robots fighting and u can't see who is who, who is autobots and who is decepticons. and is it a movie about the advanced US weapons or about Transformers? Suddenly the transformers are so weak and get beaten by some US weapons. I thought the transformers themselves said in the 1st movie that they are so advanced that they can paralyze the whole earth in seconds? :o now, the power decepticons are hit by some military plane and some laser. if Soundwave can hijack the satellite in the space, how can this happen? well, even though this movie is meant for 8-year-olds, even a 8-year-old can figure this illogical sequence out.
The good movies in this summer: the taking of pelhem 123 and startrek.
Michale bay really doesn't know how to tell a story. I suggest he attend kindergarten to re-learn story-telling again.
to those who haven't watched: watch it on a week day when you are bored, and save $2.
though this sorta movie is not about story, it is boring if it's without even a "working" story.
imagine u watch robots fighting and fighting for 1 and 1/2 hour and can't figure out who is who and who's on which side. I thought megatron or starstream has been hit numerous times in the desert, because u can't see who all those dying robots are. boo....
The first movie is also simple, but it was fun and has a working story. not this one. it's a dud.
| | |
Last edited by soulblader; 30-06-2009 at 09:24 PM..
| | | Re: Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen
AWESOME!!!!!!!!!!!! | | |
By
Arakai
on
01-07-2009, 12:19 AM
| Re: Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen
lol so much hate.. i like that part where 1 of the quotes says you need to switch off your brain to enjoy this movie | | | | | | Member reviews | | Entertainment | | 3 | | Plot | | 1 | | Acting | | 2 | | Overall | | 2 | |
Average 40%
|
| Re: Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen
watched and i will rate a 2/5
First of all the show is too draggy (150min), too action packed and messy fights.
would rather spend the money on other movie  | |
Last edited by Blueteeth; 01-07-2009 at 02:29 AM..
| | | Re: Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen
nice movie =D | | | | | Re: Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blueteeth watched and i will rate a 2/5
First of all the show is too draggy (150min), too action packed and messy fights.
would rather spend the money on other movie | agreed, all the fights too messy cannot see anything. | | | | | Re: Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen
wooohooo i watched it 3 times and i still say go and catch it it's a must see if u haf caught the first one ppl who love transformers it's a dream come true i hope there'll be a part 3,the onlu bad thing about the movie is the show didn't haf the cybertron defence team aka (hotshot,scattershot and red alert) which were one of optimus's main back up in alot of the animated series lol GundamX105A added 1 Minutes and 58 Seconds later... Quote:
Originally Posted by ThunderFbolt agreed, all the fights too messy cannot see anything. | hmmm i found it was rather clear to me maybe u arent as engrossed to the movie as i was | |
Last edited by GundamX105A; 04-07-2009 at 06:41 AM..
Reason: Post Bumping
|
By
jxiang
on
04-07-2009, 11:15 PM
| Re: Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen
juz watch is yesterday ... quite nice | | |
By
ahsoon
on
05-07-2009, 01:17 AM
| Re: Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen
yesterday night i watch liao.. can say so so ba? i watch until my ass pain.. too long.. LOL.. | | | | | Re: Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen
megan foxx is damn hawt | | |
By
DevilH
on
06-07-2009, 02:10 PM
| Re: Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen
disappointed about the devastator part. waited so long for them to combine and appear only to be taken down by the rail gun from the cruiser in mins | | | | | Re: Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen
Movie not as gd as the first film but it was still enjoyable with funny moments and lotsa CG effects. worth a watch. Megan fox is so hot! | | | | | |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Movies: 12 (1 members and 11 guests) | | cosmos89 | | Movies Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
|
